"Aus Gründen der leichteren Lesbarkeit verwenden wir im Textverlauf die männliche Form der Anrede. Die Welt der FOM ist jedoch von großer Wertschätzung der Vielfalt unter den Studierenden, Lehrenden und Mitarbeitenden geprägt und befürwortet alle Bewerbungen."
Bisherige Beispiele hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier, hier und hier in diesem Blog. Gegenbeispiel hier, anderes Beispiel für "mitgemeint" hier.
Sharon Whitfield: Gender and organizational citizenship behavior in library technology: Mixed methods study. Rowan University, College of Education, EdD Thesis, 2019
Veronica M. Gaskill: The role of the school media specialist as perceived by teachers, principals, and school media specialists. Rowan University, College of Education, MA Thesis, 1998
Mathew J. Freund: A study of the continuing library education patterns of public librarians in New Jersey. Rowan University, College of Education, MA Thesis, 2002
Olive Akpebu Adjah / Thomas Van der Walt: "Career progression of female librarians in public university libraries in Ghana". In: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51 (2019) 2, S. 331-345
Melissa Fraser-Arnott: "Personalizing professionalism: The professional identity experiences of LIS graduates in non-library roles". In: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51 (2019) 2, S. 431-439
"I am a historian of bibliotherapy and in the hopes of creating a community around the study of what is now called bibliotherapy, I have created a Google Group (Bibliotherapy-List) to share research, scholarship, questions, and event announcements. It is intended for those studying the history of what is now called bibliotherapy, and for those invested in its current practice in a multitude of contexts and forums from private therapy, public libraries, and beyond. To join, request access here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bibliotherapy-list".
Hinweis aus StanleyK.
In libraries, and in the professional discourses of librarianship and information studies, we often talk about "technology" as a means to an end. Or, we speculate about technology as though it emanated from the horizon of a futurity that appears sometimes threatening, sometimes empowering, but always inevitable: e.g., artificial intelligence will "revolutionize" the ways we find and use information. Both kinds of discourse omit the ways technologies begin and end in the flesh — how technologies shape habits of body and mind, just as those habits influence the design and construction of technologies.
The planning committee for the 2020 Gender and Sexuality in Information Studies Colloquium invites you to join continue these conversations July 24, 2020 in Washington, DC at George Washington University.
We invite proposals that address the problems, power, and potential of "technologies" in libraries and archives, past, present, and future, and seek a range of interpretations of the concept of technology.
Organizing committee:
